You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the DS curriculum, we often avoid adding the actual README as HTML in Canvas
Instead, we just add the <header> part and leave the rest of the assignment description blank, then also set up a link to our cloud IDE (IllumiDesk) by setting the submission type to "External Tool"
My proposal is to add a flag --header-only (although the actual flag name is flexible) that creates a page with the appropriate title and <header> and leaves off everything else
Creating just the header is really just string interpolation so I wasn't sure how best to incorporate this into the overall gem flow. In my fork I have a "hack" version that still creates the entire README as HTML, then throws that away to just include the header. That doesn't seem ideal for overhauling an entire course, but more structural reorganization seemed more likely to break something
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clarifying further, this thing I call the "header" (based on the HTML element used) is also called the --fis-links or -l option in the current documentation
For the DS curriculum, we often avoid adding the actual README as HTML in Canvas
Instead, we just add the
<header>
part and leave the rest of the assignment description blank, then also set up a link to our cloud IDE (IllumiDesk) by setting the submission type to "External Tool"My proposal is to add a flag
--header-only
(although the actual flag name is flexible) that creates a page with the appropriate title and<header>
and leaves off everything elseCreating just the header is really just string interpolation so I wasn't sure how best to incorporate this into the overall gem flow. In my fork I have a "hack" version that still creates the entire README as HTML, then throws that away to just include the header. That doesn't seem ideal for overhauling an entire course, but more structural reorganization seemed more likely to break something
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: