You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the explanation for a multiplication is such that the output value always depends on all its arguments (default behavior since it inherits from AtomicFunction). This is not the case if one of the arguments is 0, in which case it alone explains the result.
The production of a value for multiplication should be modified to work in the same way as, e.g. BooleanAnd when it is given a false argument.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the explanation for a multiplication is such that the output value always depends on all its arguments (default behavior since it inherits from
AtomicFunction
). This is not the case if one of the arguments is 0, in which case it alone explains the result.The production of a value for multiplication should be modified to work in the same way as, e.g.
BooleanAnd
when it is given afalse
argument.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: