-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: run integration tests against bitcoind v28 #9059
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
2792a8a
to
f2ed14c
Compare
The CI will fail until lightninglabs/docker-bitcoin-core#9 is merged and a new image is pushed to the Docker repository. |
bitcoind now seems to listen on the -bind port at all times. So we need to make sure multiple instances don't collide by using a unique port.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! My main question is what about versions before v28 now? I assume most nodes won't upgrade as quickly and we may still need to check for v27?
I'm not sure what you mean? This is for the unit and integration tests only, so no requirements change for users, Or do you mean we should have unit tests that test against both |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or do you mean we should have unit tests that test against both v27 and v28?
Yeah the testing part - like full rbf is only enabled in bitcoind v28, then we still need to be aware it's enabled in bitcoind v27 or btcd. Maybe this multi-version testing should happen in btcwallet
instead, then lnd
can start to be oblivious about the chain backend versions.
CI failed due to docker pull rate limit, otherwise LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🧪
testing against both versions of backends might be quite a big lift & not needed right now..? but perhaps something we can build in future (lets create an issue?) so that we can have some sort of "rolling-update-testing" against the 2 latest versions or something like that.
@yyforyongyu good point. Added an issue here: #9190 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 🙏
Runs all unit and integration tests against Bitcoin Core
v28
.