Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: run integration tests against bitcoind v28 #9059

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

guggero
Copy link
Collaborator

@guggero guggero commented Sep 2, 2024

Runs all unit and integration tests against Bitcoin Core v28.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited to specific labels.

Labels to auto review (1)
  • llm-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@guggero guggero force-pushed the bitcoind-28 branch 2 times, most recently from 2792a8a to f2ed14c Compare September 3, 2024 09:59
@guggero guggero changed the title CI: run integration tests against bitcoind v28.0rc1 CI: run integration tests against bitcoind v28 Oct 14, 2024
@guggero guggero added this to the v0.18.4 milestone Oct 14, 2024
@guggero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

guggero commented Oct 14, 2024

The CI will fail until lightninglabs/docker-bitcoin-core#9 is merged and a new image is pushed to the Docker repository.

bitcoind now seems to listen on the -bind port at all times. So we need
to make sure multiple instances don't collide by using a unique port.
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! My main question is what about versions before v28 now? I assume most nodes won't upgrade as quickly and we may still need to check for v27?

lnwallet/test/test_interface.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@guggero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

guggero commented Oct 14, 2024

My main question is what about versions before v28 now?

I'm not sure what you mean? This is for the unit and integration tests only, so no requirements change for users, lnd is still fully backward compatible.

Or do you mean we should have unit tests that test against both v27 and v28?

Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or do you mean we should have unit tests that test against both v27 and v28?

Yeah the testing part - like full rbf is only enabled in bitcoind v28, then we still need to be aware it's enabled in bitcoind v27 or btcd. Maybe this multi-version testing should happen in btcwallet instead, then lnd can start to be oblivious about the chain backend versions.

CI failed due to docker pull rate limit, otherwise LGTM.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ellemouton ellemouton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🧪

testing against both versions of backends might be quite a big lift & not needed right now..? but perhaps something we can build in future (lets create an issue?) so that we can have some sort of "rolling-update-testing" against the 2 latest versions or something like that.

@guggero
Copy link
Collaborator Author

guggero commented Oct 15, 2024

@yyforyongyu good point. Added an issue here: #9190

@guggero guggero requested a review from yyforyongyu October 15, 2024 18:13
Copy link
Member

@yyforyongyu yyforyongyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🙏

@guggero guggero merged commit fb5e7f4 into lightningnetwork:master Oct 16, 2024
29 of 33 checks passed
@guggero guggero deleted the bitcoind-28 branch October 16, 2024 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants