Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Wallet Research] Pick best authcore replacement on evm #73

Open
williamchong opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Wallet Research] Pick best authcore replacement on evm #73

williamchong opened this issue Dec 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@williamchong
Copy link
Member

williamchong commented Dec 18, 2024

Background:

We want to migrate user of custodial wallet service away from authcore on EVM migration UI.
Need to pick one

Description:

Potential candidates

Look for:

  • Vue@2/vanilla JS support
  • Does cross-projects OAuth login yields the same wallet address?
  • usage and size of existing projects
  • price/plan for our MAU size
@williamchong williamchong converted this from a draft issue Dec 18, 2024
@williamchong
Copy link
Member Author

williamchong commented Jan 6, 2025

Magic link seems to be best option since it is vanilla js based with wagmi support

Why

  • We can integrate it with existing likerland codebase without upgrading nuxt2
  • We can also use wagmi in book press and in the future when likerland is also nuxt3

Down side

  • pricing
  • no cross dapp wallet sharing, each dapp creates a new wallet address even with same oauth. However export private key is possible

cc @nwingt

@williamchong williamchong moved this from In progress to Ready in Likecoin to OP Jan 6, 2025
@williamchong williamchong moved this from Ready to Acceptance in Likecoin to OP Jan 6, 2025
@williamchong williamchong moved this from Acceptance to Done in Likecoin to OP Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants