-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Safer reload handling #295
Comments
@radosroka Is the dnf plugin still shipped in Fedora? Or do you think rpm is doing this? If it is rpm, maybe we need to see how it retriggers a load. |
rpm-plugin-fapolicyd is present on the list. @SkewedZeppelin can you provide fapolicyd logs when running in debug mode? |
@SkewedZeppelin would you check whether #297 fix your issue? |
@radosroka |
Closing, haven't encountered this at all under F40. Thank you. |
Just hit this for this first time on f40 with fapolicyd-1.3.3-4.fc40 |
@SkewedZeppelin thank you for the update. I will continue with investigation. |
I've been experiencing this more frequently. Can there be an sanity check added to not make the reload effective if its entry count is substantially smaller ie. likely broken? |
I've been using fapolicyd for a few months now under Fedora 39.
I've encountered an issue that happens probably 1 in every 3 or 4 times when running eg. dnf update or dnf install.
fapolicyd will reload after dnf completes, but something happens and all future executions are entirely denied locking up the system
I think it might actually be a race condition where sometimes after dnf runs, dnf makecache is immediately automatically invoked.
So fapolicyd is already in the middle of reloading and tries to reload again or maybe makecache takes a lock on the rpm database and prevents reading?
It seems more likely to occur on my faster desktop than it does on my slower laptop as well.
edit: package versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: