Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add support for configuring stonith levels #147

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tomjelinek
Copy link
Member

Enhancement:
Add support for configuring stonith levels, also known as fencing topology

Reason:
This is required so users can configure multi-level fencing or fencing of machines with redundant power sources

Result:
The role is capable of configuring stonith levels, also known as fencing topology

Issue Tracker Tickets (Jira or BZ if any):
RHEL-4624

@tomjelinek tomjelinek requested a review from richm as a code owner October 4, 2023 12:39
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2748cdc) 80.45% compared to head (a2537d0) 80.45%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #147   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.45%   80.45%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         133      133           
=======================================
  Hits          107      107           
  Misses         26       26           
Flag Coverage Δ
sanity ∅ <ø> (∅)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tomjelinek
Copy link
Member Author

[citest]

@tomjelinek tomjelinek merged commit a2537d0 into main Oct 5, 2023
22 checks passed
@tomjelinek tomjelinek deleted the fencing-levels branch October 5, 2023 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants