对于个人部署，目前服务器端数据库版本的登录过于臃肿 #4584
-
📦 部署环境Docker 📌 软件版本latest 💻 系统环境Ubuntu 🌐 浏览器Firefox 🐛 问题描述首先，很感谢作者开发出服务器端数据库的版本，这也是我一直期待看到的功能。 作者也花了诸多心血用于各种身份验证系统，但是有一点需求可能被忽略了，对于个人 self-hosted 用户而言，我并不希望进行如此复杂的身份验证，也正如很多自部署应用的方式：用户名+密码足矣，犯不着再去开个实例 也许是目前的版本中已经可以实现我说的这种，但目前在 doc 中尚未找到，如有遗漏，请纠正我 总结：对于个人用户而言，可以只需要设置账号，密码这种简单 / 甚至没有 的模式，而不是通过第三方来进行身份验证 📷 复现步骤No response 🚦 期望结果No response 📝 补充信息No response |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 6 comments 1 reply
-
📦 Deployment environmentDocker 📌 Software versionlatest 💻 System environmentUbuntu 🌐 BrowserFirefox 🐛 Problem descriptionFirst of all, I am very grateful to the author for developing a server-side database version. This is also a feature I have been looking forward to seeing. The author has also spent a lot of effort on various authentication systems, but one requirement may have been overlooked. For individual self-hosted users, I do not want to perform such complex authentication, just like many self-deployed applications. Method: Username + password are enough, there is no need to open another instance Maybe the current version can already implement what I mentioned, but it has not yet been found in the doc. If there is any omission, please correct me. Summary: For individual users, they can only set up an account and password in a simple / even no mode, instead of using a third party for identity verification. 📷 Steps to reproduceNo response 🚦 Expected resultsNo response 📝 Supplementary informationNo response |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you for raising an issue. We will investigate into the matter and get back to you as soon as possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
不计划做。在你看来简单的用户名密码的功能背后的复杂度基本上和写一个 LobeChat 差不多，我并不想承担这种复杂度，专业的事情交给更专业的团队去做更合适。 另外加一个auth组件是否臃肿这个完全因人而异，有这个感受大概率是因为之前可能你没玩过类似的部署应用。有的用户还因为部署 casdoor 之后觉得好用，然后把他所有的服务都统一到一个里。 既然玩自部署了，这个复杂度还是需要你自己接下的 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not planning to do it. In your opinion, the complexity behind the simple username and password function is basically the same as writing a LobeChat. I don’t want to take on this complexity. It is more appropriate to leave professional matters to a more professional team. In addition, whether adding an auth component is bloated depends entirely on each person. You may feel this way because you may not have played a similar deployment application before. Some users also found it useful after deploying casdoor, and then unified all their services into one. Since you are playing with self-deployment, you still need to take on this complexity yourself. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This issue is closed, If you have any questions, you can comment and reply. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
给你看一个 OpenWebUI 自己做了登录注册，并默认给你预置一个账号密码的后果： 
安全无小事 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
哈人 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
不计划做。在你看来简单的用户名密码的功能背后的复杂度基本上和写一个 LobeChat 差不多，我并不想承担这种复杂度，专业的事情交给更专业的团队去做更合适。
另外加一个auth组件是否臃肿这个完全因人而异，有这个感受大概率是因为之前可能你没玩过类似的部署应用。有的用户还因为部署 casdoor 之后觉得好用，然后把他所有的服务都统一到一个里。
既然玩自部署了，这个复杂度还是需要你自己接下的