Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why does it look so bad? #17

Open
h-lame opened this issue Jan 5, 2015 · 16 comments
Open

Why does it look so bad? #17

h-lame opened this issue Jan 5, 2015 · 16 comments
Milestone

Comments

@h-lame
Copy link
Member

h-lame commented Jan 5, 2015

The design of lrug.org is mostly "a dev did it without much thought", we should apply some modern thinking and make it nicer. Things to think about:

  • mobile experience (currently no margins and horrid)
  • no red dashed borders (so 2006)
  • one of those cool webfonts (this one perhaps?)
  • &c
  • &c
@h-lame h-lame added this to the MAKE IT NICER milestone Jan 5, 2015
@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Jan 5, 2015

This issue, much like the milestone, really just a placeholder for some more broken down effort later.

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

MikeRogers0 commented Aug 28, 2020

I'd be super up for having a devs-do-design session & seeing if I can come up with a design that feels more modern.

If I was to take the current design & made it responsive (maybe also throw in some modern stack approaches), would that be a good start?

Bob Ross

@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Aug 28, 2020

Making what we have work better on smaller screens would definitely be a good thing. And a fresher design in general also sounds good. It's quite subjective though, so I wouldn't want you to put in loads of effort and have us be "nah". Is there an obvious light-weight way of proposing a new design without actually putting in the effort to do it?

"modern stack approaches" definitely sounds interesting, but it really depends what you mean. The site design right now is p. simple so we don't really need SCSS, let alone more complex build-chains that rely on the asset-pipeline or webpack or whatever. That said, perhaps these toolchains would let us explore better design, so it's a chicken-and-egg problem really.

I guess if you were to come up with a new design that we all liked, and the price of implementing that is adopting a more complex toolchain that's probably worth it. But maybe not for it's own sake. Does that make sense?

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

@h-lame Make sense :) I think I'll start with making a small change, then that might open up the conversation to what we'd like to tweak next :)

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome, thank you for assisting in that :)

The next steps I'd like to look at are:

  1. Remove the normalize.css from the repo, instead pull it in via Yarn.
  2. Find out what people want expect the LRUG website. E.g. Should it just tell people about meetups, or be a wider gateway into learning Ruby/Getting a Ruby job.

@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Sep 17, 2020

Remove the normalize.css from the repo, instead pull it in via Yarn.

yarn isn't a dependency of the project at the moment, can we avoid introducing it? Are there other ways to pull in normalize.css if it's something that is updated frequently enough we need to keep it super fresh? On it's own, pulling normalise.css from some other source doesn't feel like a compelling enough reason to add yarn and node_modules, what else that we want to do would this enable for us?

If we do need to start involving node_modules could we use npm instead of yarn? My experience with yarn in rails projects is that it's pretty inflexible. I also thought that npm had surpassed yarn in functionality (e.g. the things yarn added that npm didn't have at the time yarn was created, npm now has so yarn feels redundant).

Find out what people want expect the LRUG website. E.g. Should it just tell people about meetups, or be a wider gateway into learning Ruby/Getting a Ruby job.

I'd be super interested in this. I suspect some folk might want that, but also, not want to have to spend any effort on it. Be useful to ask people what they want from the site, but also how they would get involved to manage and maintain it. Lets find out though!

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

MikeRogers0 commented Sep 17, 2020

normalize.css/yarn: I'll do some research into options. I'm keen to keep 3rd party files out of our repo, though we could always come back to it another time.

Be useful to ask people what they want from the site, but also how they would get involved to manage and maintain it. Lets find out though!

Agreed, even if we can't change it massively it would be nice to know what ideas people have. Would it be possible to put out a Tweet saying: ~"We're keen to improve https://lrug.org - What would you change to help serve the local ruby community?"

Off the top of my head, one thing I'm keen to work on is displaying local jobs with fewer clicks. I found http://lists.lrug.org/pipermail/chat-lrug.org/2020-September/thread.html which lists some really awesome ones but it feels disconnected from the main site.

@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Sep 17, 2020

Agreed, even if we can't change it massively it would be nice to know what ideas people have. Would it be possible to put out a Tweet saying: ~"We're keen to improve https://lrug.org - What would you change to help serve the local ruby community?"

Might be best to come up with a survey and get folk to fill that in. We've used google forms for this in the past, would you be interested in coming up with something?

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

@h-lame Yeah, I can put together a survey :) I should have some time next week, what is the best way to setup a google form? I'm guessing we'd want to do it via a LRUG owned google account?

@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Sep 17, 2020

@h-lame Yeah, I can put together a survey :)

Cool, thanks!

I'm guessing we'd want to do it via a LRUG owned google account?

If such a thing existed, perhaps. In the past when we've needed things like this we've just done them from our personal accounts and shared access amongst the organisers. So I think it'd be fine that way this time too (assuming you have a personal google account and were willing to share those details with us so we could collaborate).

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

I've started working on a survey, getting the questions right is a little tricky but so far I've come up with:

LRUG - Website User Insights

We're looking to improve our current website to support existing users, while also helping new members find their feet.

To help us, we'd like to ask you a few questions about how you use the LRUG website, your responses will help us decide what we should focus our development efforts on.

Responses of this survey will be public.

  1. How often do you visit the LRUG website?

    • Every Week
    • Once a month
    • A few times a year
    • I've never visited the LRUG website
  2. What would be your primary purpose for visiting the LRUG website?

    • Find out about the next event
    • Looking for information about Ruby
    • Searching for local Ruby jobs
    • To find Rubyists from London
    • To listen to episodes of the LRUG Podcast
    • Read the mailing list
    • Other ( Please State )
  3. Where do you normally go to find out about up coming LRUG events?

    • LRUG's Website
    • Twitter
    • Eventbrite
    • The mailing list
    • Oher (Please State)
  4. Is there anything you think should be changed on the existing LRUG website?
    ( Open ended question, so a text response here )

  5. Are there any user groups you consider to have a really brilliant website?
    ( Open ended question, so a text response here )

What do you think?

@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Sep 27, 2020

That survey sounds good. Might I suggest adding:

to find links to videos, blog posts, slides, etc... for talks

to Q2? Other than that, looks good.

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome. I've imported that into a Google Form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScgrBLpCv7tHvxCgfe2TuKAM4iL-JPbzEdJ_Unk7OFH_VNpuA/viewform?usp=sf_link

If you have an email address I can add you as a collaborator if you'd like? / How do we go about sharing the link publicly?

@h-lame
Copy link
Member Author

h-lame commented Sep 28, 2020

You can add me as: murray DOT steele AT gmail DOT com - I'll then add the other LRUG folk that would be interested in the results. I think you could email the list explaining you've been doing some work on the website recently and wanted to get some insight on what to work on next. We'll then do a tweet with the url from the email.

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

I've added you & sent it to the mailing list :) 🤞

@MikeRogers0
Copy link
Contributor

We started getting responses @h-lame :D Would we be able to share the link on Twitter / mention it at the next meetup?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants