diff --git a/tests/conformance/basic.lua b/tests/conformance/basic.lua
index 17f4497af..98f8000ed 100644
--- a/tests/conformance/basic.lua
+++ b/tests/conformance/basic.lua
@@ -726,16 +726,15 @@ assert((function()
     return sum
 end)() == 15)
 
--- the reason why this test is interesting is that the table created here has arraysize=0 and a single hash element with key = 1.0
--- ipairs must iterate through that
+-- ipairs will not iterate through hash part
 assert((function()
-    local arr = { [1] = 42 }
+    local arr = { [1] = 1, [42] = 42, x = 10 }
     local sum = 0
     for i,v in ipairs(arr) do
     sum = sum + v
     end
     return sum
-end)() == 42)
+end)() == 1)
 
 -- the reason why this test is interesting is it ensures we do correct mutability analysis for locals
 local function chainTest(n)
diff --git a/tests/conformance/tables.lua b/tests/conformance/tables.lua
index 3f1efd8e2..c739f5559 100644
--- a/tests/conformance/tables.lua
+++ b/tests/conformance/tables.lua
@@ -412,8 +412,8 @@ do
 
   assert(table.find({false, true}, true) == 2)
 
-  -- make sure table.find checks the hash portion as well by constructing a table literal that forces the value into the hash part
-  assert(table.find({[(1)] = true}, true) == 1)
+  -- make sure table.find checks the hash portion as well
+  assert(table.find({[(2)] = true}, true, 2) == 2)
 end
 
 -- test table.concat