Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

about results(Average AUCs in % with StdDevs (over 10 seeds) ) #17

Open
tommying opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

about results(Average AUCs in % with StdDevs (over 10 seeds) ) #17

tommying opened this issue Jan 6, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@tommying
Copy link

tommying commented Jan 6, 2020

Hi, I am mystified by this (Average AUCs in % with StdDevs (over 10 seeds) ).

Do you mean to get the average results over 10 seeds.
If then, what should be the range of seeds? (1 - 10 ? or 10 -20 ?). The results varied widely, because of different seed settings.
Can you help me with this question? Thank you.

@dimimal
Copy link

dimimal commented Apr 9, 2020

I have the same question as well! If someone from the team could provide any help, that would be great!

@omid-ghozatlou
Copy link

This is also my question and I think its related to collect_results.py in the utils folder. and I have another question: If we set seed to any number except -1, the result must not change by rerunning. however when I use preparing the results of both pretraining and training change widely. it worth mentioning that if you set pretraining False, the network is trained without any pre-trained weights and the result of many times training are the same for the specific seed value. (of course except -1)
Anybody knows why seed does not work for autoencoder?

@omid-ghozatlou
Copy link

According to collect_results.py range of seed is 1-10

@Longchao1047027852
Copy link

I also have such problems. Should the author publish the seeds, otherwise the training results may deviate due to different seeds.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants