-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe C-COIL approach #6
Comments
I have planned to write a tutorial on that submission but have been distracted by other projects. I hope to get it done as soon as possible, at least by the end of the week. Let's leave this issue open; feel free to ping me if you don't hear from me. |
Hi Luyu. Can you send a copy of your C-COIL initializer paper to my email: [email protected]? I suppose your coCondenser can also be used to initialize COIL. Did you try coCondenser+COIL? Does it improve COIL? |
Or add it to the repo/README: https://github.com/luyug/COIL/tree/main/examples/c-coil |
Hello, thanks for reminding me on this! C-COIL is actually Condenser + COIL and the Condenser paper is no longer under review. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08253 We have not done experiments with coCondenser initialized COIL, partly because coCondenser can achieve okay performance on its own being a dense retriever and partly because of our limited GPU resource. I think such experiments are definitely interesting but the question is whether we can build better software/infrastructure to support COIL. |
Maybe just link to https://github.com/luyug/COIL/tree/main/examples/c-coil from the main README then since there's no mention of C-COIL there. Then we can close this issue probably. |
Just wondering if you could add somewhere a description of your MS MARCO submission "C-COIL + RoBERTa" from 14/07/2021. Which modifications to COIL have you made and what was the motivation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: