Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Q: What parameters should I need to tweak for viral ChipSeq #656

Open
Rohit-Satyam opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Q: What parameters should I need to tweak for viral ChipSeq #656

Rohit-Satyam opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Rohit-Satyam
Copy link

I came across several posts that the MACS is not fine-tuned for Viral ChipSeq (eg SARS-CoV2) (See Post1, Post2. What parameters do you think needs to be adjusted to get reliable peaks?

@taoliu
Copy link
Contributor

taoliu commented Sep 8, 2024

@Rohit-Satyam Couple of suggestions for small genome peak calling: 1. usually you need to downsample your data. MACS uses the p-values to measure significancy and a p-value is too sensitive when the sample size is overly large. You may get a significant p-value even if the fold change is small. A 50-100 fold genome coverage may already be good enough. ( fold coverage ~= read_lengthnumber_of_reads/genome_size, or number_of_reads ~= fold_coveragegenome_size/read_length ). 2. Assign a reasonable 'effective genome size' for callpeak -g option, if you know the genome size of the virus. 3. As the Post2 mentioned, try to use the fine-tuning steps described in this document: https://macs3-project.github.io/MACS/docs/Advanced_Step-by-step_Peak_Calling.html since it's more flexible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants