title | abstract | layout | series | publisher | issn | id | month | tex_title | firstpage | lastpage | page | order | cycles | bibtex_author | author | date | address | container-title | volume | genre | issued | extras | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
f-Domain Adversarial Learning: Theory and Algorithms |
Unsupervised domain adaptation is used in many machine learning applications where, during training, a model has access to unlabeled data in the target domain, and a related labeled dataset. In this paper, we introduce a novel and general domain-adversarial framework. Specifically, we derive a novel generalization bound for domain adaptation that exploits a new measure of discrepancy between distributions based on a variational characterization of f-divergences. It recovers the theoretical results from Ben-David et al. (2010a) as a special case and supports divergences used in practice. Based on this bound, we derive a new algorithmic framework that introduces a key correction in the original adversarial training method of Ganin et al. (2016). We show that many regularizers and ad-hoc objectives introduced over the last years in this framework are then not required to achieve performance comparable to (if not better than) state-of-the-art domain-adversarial methods. Experimental analysis conducted on real-world natural language and computer vision datasets show that our framework outperforms existing baselines, and obtains the best results for f-divergences that were not considered previously in domain-adversarial learning. |
inproceedings |
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
PMLR |
2640-3498 |
acuna21a |
0 |
f-Domain Adversarial Learning: Theory and Algorithms |
66 |
75 |
66-75 |
66 |
false |
Acuna, David and Zhang, Guojun and Law, Marc T. and Fidler, Sanja |
|
2021-07-01 |
Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning |
139 |
inproceedings |
|
|