We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We need a way to understand how far we are along the mapping process and how far we still need to go.
unmapped-in-scope
unmapped-excluded
mapped
category
### Example Table:
Makefile
analysis/icd10cm-mapping-progress.tsv: mirror/icd10cm.owl exclusions/icd10.tsv mappings/icd10cm.sssom.tsv python........
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh, you got to making an issue for this. And it is detailed. Thank you Nico!
There's a chance I can start this today or tomorrow. Otherwise I can start next Thursday.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@hrshdhgd Can you link ICD10CM exact matches?
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/monarch-initiative/mondo/45f95c89d96d38db3d10b69cbb88a514afe01bff/src/ontology/mappings/mondo_exactmatch_icd10cm.sssom.tsv
joeflack4
No branches or pull requests
We need a way to understand how far we are along the mapping process and how far we still need to go.
Functional requirements:
unmapped-in-scope
: but in scope (it is a disease)unmapped-excluded
: but excluded (because out of scope)mapped
.unmapped-in-scope
,unmapped-excluded
andmapped
add up to 100%.Inputs to analysis:
Output:
category
that is either unmapped-excluded, mapped or unmapped-in-scope### Example Table:
Non-functional requirements:
Makefile
goal hereThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: