You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the 1 degree companion run, there are some grid cells where biomass for some functional types drops uncontrollably:
in the 0.1 degree run, there is uncontrolled growth in some functional types while others go negative:
I think we need to introduce a floor for biomass, at which point we do not let it drop any further. It might be the case that preventing negative values will be sufficient to keep other groups from growing unbounded, otherwise will we need a cap?
For completeness, I'll also mention that we should investigate the forcing datasets at these points; it might be the case that the growth / loss is a natural response to the forcing we are providing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the 1 degree companion run, there are some grid cells where
biomass
for some functional types drops uncontrollably:in the 0.1 degree run, there is uncontrolled growth in some functional types while others go negative:
I think we need to introduce a floor for biomass, at which point we do not let it drop any further. It might be the case that preventing negative values will be sufficient to keep other groups from growing unbounded, otherwise will we need a cap?
For completeness, I'll also mention that we should investigate the forcing datasets at these points; it might be the case that the growth / loss is a natural response to the forcing we are providing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: