You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I re-read the medleydb paper, and it doesn't actually say how the instrument segment annotations were computed from the activation functions. Is it just threshold at 0.5 and then run-length encode samples to intervals? Or is there some smoothing involved?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Rounding activations is often a lot worse than using some threshold on the first-order derivative (i.e. peak picking) to determine local max/min, no? Or this for example, is really good IMO (running averages).
I re-read the medleydb paper, and it doesn't actually say how the instrument segment annotations were computed from the activation functions. Is it just threshold at 0.5 and then run-length encode samples to intervals? Or is there some smoothing involved?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: