Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support for websockets #3798

Open
richvdh opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Support for websockets #3798

richvdh opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels
feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal

Comments

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Mar 6, 2018 •
edited by turt2live
Loading

Author: @richvdh, @krombel
Documentation: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/blob/master/drafts/websockets.rst, https://docs.google.com/document/d/104ClehFBgqLQbf4s-AKX2ijr8sOAxcizfcRs_atsB0g/edit
Date: 2015-11-16

We should let clients do sync requests (at least) over websockets.

There is a draft of how this might look at https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/blob/master/attic/drafts/websockets.rst.

[I thought we must have an issue for this, but couldn't find one].
@richvdh richvdh added the feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration label Mar 6, 2018
@turt2live
Copy link
Member

There's a PR on synapse for this, although I couldn't find the spec issue either.

matrix-org/synapse#2388

@uhoreg uhoreg mentioned this issue Jun 4, 2018
Closed
@uhoreg uhoreg added the proposal A matrix spec change proposal label Jun 4, 2018
@krombel krombel mentioned this issue Sep 6, 2018
Closed
@turt2live turt2live added the kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff label Apr 21, 2020
@ShadowJonathan
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be turned into a normal MSC PR?

@ShadowJonathan
Copy link
Contributor

ShadowJonathan commented Feb 13, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Also, isn't it superseded by #2108?

@anoadragon453 anoadragon453 mentioned this issue Apr 6, 2021
Merged
@turt2live turt2live added the needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. label Jun 8, 2021
@richvdh richvdh mentioned this issue Mar 6, 2018
Open
@richvdh richvdh transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals Mar 1, 2022
@ara4n ara4n transferred this issue from matrix-org/matrix-spec May 9, 2022
@JacobCube
Copy link

Is this still not possible in Matrix today?

@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Feb 7, 2025

Nope. It's just never been much of a priority; it doesn't seem like it would make much difference in practice, but would come with a bunch of maintenance overhead.

If someone wanted to do a prototype and could demonstrate it made a real difference, that would be interesting, but that's unlikely to be me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature Suggestion for a significant extension which needs considerable consideration kind:feature MSC for not-core and not-maintenance stuff needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@uhoreg @turt2live @anoadragon453 @richvdh @ShadowJonathan @JacobCube