You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to stay for the analysis with the "allVehicles" container.
If the CarrierReader is the problem, Then we may need the option to read the carriers file even, if some vehicleTypes are missing. This should not be the default because for the normal simulation and tour planning, we require all vehicle types, but here for the analysis, we do not.
Please see #3036 with the original issue from @rewertvsp :
Changes the input vehicleFile for the analysis.
the reason is that the allVehicles file only contains the types of the used vehicles
Problem: if we read a carrier which uses not all available vehicles the types of this vehicles are not in the allVehicles file, and it creates this exception
Solution:
using the carriersVehicleTypes file instead
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like to stay for the analysis with the "allVehicles" container.
If the CarrierReader is the problem, Then we may need the option to read the carriers file even, if some vehicleTypes are missing. This should not be the default because for the normal simulation and tour planning, we require all vehicle types, but here for the analysis, we do not.
Originally posted by @kt86 in #3036 (comment)
Please see #3036 with the original issue from @rewertvsp :
Changes the input vehicleFile for the analysis.
Problem: if we read a carrier which uses not all available vehicles the types of this vehicles are not in the allVehicles file, and it creates this exception
Solution:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: