You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran the time spectral test case and tried to scale mach and omega in the same proportion to keep the same reduced frequency. The results of clq and cmq calculated by fitting the data show inconsitency. It make me confused because In my understanding, no matter how mach and omega change, as long as the same k is maintained, the dynamic derivatives should not differ significantly. I listed my results as below and the fitting method follows the paper from doi:10.2514/1.j052922. I'm not sure it is a bug or just my understaning is incorrect?
This discussion was converted from issue #338 on January 04, 2024 18:24.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello everyone,
I ran the time spectral test case and tried to scale mach and omega in the same proportion to keep the same reduced frequency. The results of clq and cmq calculated by fitting the data show inconsitency. It make me confused because In my understanding, no matter how mach and omega change, as long as the same k is maintained, the dynamic derivatives should not differ significantly. I listed my results as below and the fitting method follows the paper from doi:10.2514/1.j052922. I'm not sure it is a bug or just my understaning is incorrect?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions