Is changing the sender within an existing thread allowed?

[jkiddo]

What should happen in an existing correspondance flow if recipient A sends a message 'm1' to B and then C responds to A with a message 'm2' that references 'm1' using Provenance.what.reference. Is that allowed?

[tmsMedcom]

Is this in relation to the CareCommunication message? In that case, a correspondance with replies is between two communicating parties, not three. If B wants C to answer, 'm1' should be forwarded to C.

[jkiddo]

Right - but is it allowed?

[jkiddo]

Since the acknowledgement are sent on business level (medcomdk/dk-medcom-acknowledgement#33 (comment)) why would it ever make sense to resend it from business sender perspective? No state will change due to the retransmission. Why wouldn't VANS automatically produce a NACK or do the retry itself?

[ovi-medcom]

Since the acknowledgement are sent on business level (medcomdk/dk-medcom-acknowledgement#33 (comment)) why would it ever make sense to resend it from business sender perspective? No state will change due to the retransmission. Why wouldn't VANS automatically produce a NACK or do the retry itself?

Acknowledgements are on technical not on business level. Advanced handling of transmission scenarios like in email messages if acks were turned on in emails, has very firmly been rejected from the business organizations. The staff is often in critical scenarios with real world patients and don't want to figure out, whar the heck is going on in a carecommunication exchange. We tried to go The "email"-metaphor way, but it has been rejected, and therefore also strict rules around the exchange..
I can't figure out what you want to resend from business ender perspective. Can you elaborateon that?

[jkiddo]

Sorry #37 (comment) should have gone into #38

[jkiddo]

Right - but is it allowed?

So - to reiterate: is it allowed or should a NACK be sent in this case?

[ovi-medcom]

Taking over someone else's communication is allowed in a new message thread, not as a continuation of an existing.
It is decided that either the automation is done by the end user application or manually by the end user. No automatization can be delegated to VANS. The power is in the hand of the end user.

[jkiddo]

Is that a yes or a no?

[ovi-medcom]

No