chore(deps): bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.3 to 1.12.2

[dependabot]

Bumps pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.10.3 to 1.12.2.

Release notes

Sourced from pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish's releases.

v1.12.2

🐛 What's Fixed

The fix for signing legacy zip sdists turned out to be incomplete, so @​woodruffw💰 promptly produced another follow-up that updated pypi-attestations from v0.0.13 to v0.0.15 in #297. This is the only change since the previous release.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.12.1...v1.12.2

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

v1.12.1

🐛 What's Fixed

Version v1.12.0 hit several rare corner cases we never considered fully supported, and this release fixes a few of those. In #294, @​webknjaz💰 improved the self-hosted runner experience by pre-installing Python if it's not there, and with #293 the ability to use the action on GitHub Enterprise instances has been restored. The latter should've also fixed the ability to invoke pypi-publish from nested in-repo composite actions — another exotic use-case that was never tested in our CI. @​woodruffw💰 also managed to squeeze in a last-minute fix for detecting legacy .zip sdists while producing attestations via #295.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.12.0...v1.12.1

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

🙏 Huge Thanks to all the bug reporters for posting the logs, helping inspect the problems and verify the regression fixes!

v1.12.0

⚡️ Why Should You Update?

This is a minor version bump, but it does not add any new user-facing interfaces. Still, I felt like it should not be a patch-release: this update brings significant changes to the action invocation and internal release process.

Previously, each invocation of pypi-publish required building a container image in the invoking CI job. This was inefficient and added about 30 seconds to the publishing jobs at their startup just to build the container.

I wanted to improve this for over three years (#58) and a little over half a year ago @​br3ndonland💰 stepped up and offered a very comprehensive solution to the limitation I was hoping to overcome: #230.

Going forward, I'm going to pre-build per-version containers prior to cutting each release. And the action invocations will just pull the image from GitHub Container registry.

[!CAUTION] Known quirks:

• This seems to not work on self-hosted runners without a python executable: #289. The workaround could be installing it prior to running the action.
• Pinning to commit hashes does not work: #290. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed or switch to Git tags for now. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress. UPD: This was an issue during the first 12 hours post release and it has been addressed upstream by publishing a commit SHA-tagged image for the release on Nov 12, 2024 at 10:27 UTC+1.
• Calling pypi-publish from another nested repo-local composite action might be breaking file paths: #291. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.
• Running within GitHub Enterprise fails on the action repo clone: #292. Workaround: postpone updating until it's fixed. Subscribe to that issue to follow the progress.

🪞 Full Diff: pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@v1.11.0...v1.12.0

🧔‍♂️ Release Manager: @​webknjaz 🇺🇦

... (truncated)

Commits

• 15c56db Merge pull request #297 from trail-of-forks/ww/bump-pypi-attestations
• fe8d148 requirements: bump pypi-attestations to 0.0.15
• 1f5d4ec Merge pull request #295 from trail-of-forks/ww/fix-sdist-collection
• fec2f0c attestations: collect *.zip sdists as well
• a8b73a6 Merge pull request #294 from webknjaz/bugfixes/optional-python
• 9b4dfb0 ✨ Pre-install Python if there's none
• 0a87186 Merge pull request #293 from webknjaz/bugfixes/uncheckout-intermediate-action
• dfcfeca 🧪 Use prefetched action to make trampoline
• 0d02f37 📝💅 Update the CI/CD badge in README
• 61da13d Merge pull request #230 from br3ndonland/ghcr
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to add @meltano/engineering as a reviewer to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/meltano/dbt-ext/pulls/82/requested_reviewers: 422 - Validation Failed
Error summary:
  Could not add requested reviewers to pull request. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request

[dependabot]

The following labels could not be found: deps.

[edgarrmondragon]

@dependabot merge