Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using ripgrep instead of git grep #59

Open
atoomic opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Consider using ripgrep instead of git grep #59

atoomic opened this issue Mar 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement Feature Request

Comments

@atoomic
Copy link
Member

atoomic commented Mar 11, 2021

Consider using a faster alternate to git grep for example ripgrep as suggested by @oalders

view: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep
@toddr
Copy link
Member

toddr commented Jun 3, 2022

at the least, we could use it to replace git grep -l but that would mean ripgrep would be reading 1,600,000 files instead of the git blobs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Feature Request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@toddr @atoomic