Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gallery View (Gallery Mode Related) #339

Open
omodia opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Gallery View (Gallery Mode Related) #339

omodia opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request gallery mode temporary label

Comments

@omodia
Copy link

omodia commented Jan 22, 2024

Type of reader (if reader related)

None

Description of the new feature / enhancement

As you have decided to implement #292, I would like to propose some features / ideas related to it.

  • As the gallery mode is basically the home screen of the app shifting from the current 'list view' to 'large, extra large view', hence it would not become a library manager, but it would just have two different view modes. (This is only possible because of the default location of the app as it currently shows all the mangas in default loction in list view, in the same way it would then show in gallery view).
  • And as the underlying reader (reader settings, side list, app settings, epub, manga reader) would not change, therefore below are some features that will make it both offline and optional online functionality if users need anilist.

1. Gallery View

  • The user chosen default location folders will just be displayed as large folders.
  • The number of folders in a row should be configurable from 2 to 4 folders / Epub in a row either slider or drop down menu.
  • In this way, only the home screen layout and a couple of app settings would be changed other than the underlying app code. (See supporting information for settings changes).
  • The search bar as shown in the image should be visible by default and for bookmarks, continue reading it should be linked to already present setting.

Scenario when this would be used?

End user experience. Here is the layout sample. Please do improvise as you see fit.


Base 1


298630386-b291cb17-e15a-4e1d-ab6a-dc88ebaf095e

Supporting information

No response

@omodia omodia added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to For Review in yomikiru todo Jan 22, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for your feedback and suggestions. Please note that the author might only respond on weekends, so we kindly ask for your patience and understanding.

@mienaiyami
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the detailed images.
I had almost same layout in mind for it. My initial plan was to keep everything same as current app but only add a button that will show history (as main section, with library-like view) and bookmarks, but since it will be a while before I can start working on it, it might change.

@omodia
Copy link
Author

omodia commented Jan 22, 2024

  • (See supporting information for settings changes).

See #342 for settings changes.

@zeoint
Copy link

zeoint commented Jan 22, 2024

Cool Layout.

@mienaiyami mienaiyami added the gallery mode temporary label label Jan 27, 2024
@omodia
Copy link
Author

omodia commented Mar 30, 2024

but only add a button that will show history (as main section, with library-like view) and bookmarks

  • Only show one among location and history in library-like view.
  • Cause after some calculation, the images will take up a lot of ram.
  • Example 30 images (folders/manga) averaging 2mb per image = 60 mb burden on RAM.
  • So only show either location or history in librar-like view.
    • If its location its fixed. But for history, when a record is deleted, one needs to add an image every time. So location would be better, imo.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request gallery mode temporary label
Projects
Status: For Review
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants