Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Extend tests for the NaBSL cases for the enforcedSpec and the NaBSLRequest scenarios #221

Open
mpryc opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Extend tests for the NaBSL cases for the enforcedSpec and the NaBSLRequest scenarios #221

mpryc opened this issue Feb 24, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
nabsl priority-low

Comments

@mpryc
Copy link
Collaborator

mpryc commented Feb 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

NonAdminBackupStorageLocation tests should be extended to cover:

  • EnforcedBslSpec once implemented for the NABSL spec review on what is admin-enforceable and what is restricted for non-admin users. #204 enforcement part
  • NonAdminBackupStorageLocationRequest scenarios that tests case in which:
    • rejected NaBSL is moved back to approved
    • rejected NaBSL is moved back to pending
    • pending NaBSL is approved (exists as part of current implementation)
    • pending NaBSL is rejected
    • approved NaBSL is moved back to pending
    • approved NaBSL is moved to rejected
    • NaBSLReques is deleted (same case as moving back to pending)
    • NaBSL is modified causing the NaBSL object to have not allowed to update spec condition

The above scenarios were manually tested during development for the #216
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
nabsl priority-low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mpryc