You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was curious how Mimi handles the time integration, but looking into the examples it seems that in Mimi every run_timestep has to be formulated as recurrence relation, i.e.
$$X_{i+i} = F(X_i, t_i; P)$$
the next time step $i+1$ of a variable(s) $X$ as a function of its current value(s) $X_i$ some time $t_i$ and some parameters $P$ in contrast to formulating it as a differential equation
$$\frac{dX}{dt} = F(X_i, t_i; P)$$
whereby F, the run_timestep, would return the tendency. Consequently, I found some examples where some Euler forward step essentially seems to be hardcoded into the run_timestep function, e.g.
I'm just wondering how much control would one have if a formulation as differential equation was preferred, I see the time dimension often defined as 2015:2100 or 2015:ts:2100 or similar, so it seems to me you're using year as unit here but one could use sub-year steps or multiyear steps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was curious how Mimi handles the time integration, but looking into the examples it seems that in Mimi every
run_timestep
has to be formulated as recurrence relation, i.e.the next time step$i+1$ of a variable(s) $X$ as a function of its current value(s) $X_i$ some time $t_i$ and some parameters $P$ in contrast to formulating it as a differential equation
whereby
F
, therun_timestep
, would return the tendency. Consequently, I found some examples where some Euler forward step essentially seems to be hardcoded into therun_timestep
function, e.g.https://github.com/raddleverse/MimiBRICK.jl/blob/84c4bc4a6823c04c0b9467394a2d9822f7cdf105/src/components/thermal_expansion_component.jl#L44
https://github.com/anthofflab/MimiDICE2016R2.jl/blob/3d48bb075455542e61622b78444d927b7557c992/src/components/emissions_component.jl#L30
https://github.com/anthofflab/MimiFAIR.jl/blob/5b334a00ac0492af38e8e1f2a69cde786e561c40/src/components/temperature.jl#L32
I'm just wondering how much control would one have if a formulation as differential equation was preferred, I see the time dimension often defined as
2015:2100
or2015:ts:2100
or similar, so it seems to me you're using year as unit here but one could use sub-year steps or multiyear steps?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: