Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need punctuation cleanup #68

Open
jhaas-pfrc opened this issue Jun 16, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

Need punctuation cleanup #68

jhaas-pfrc opened this issue Jun 16, 2021 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
cleanup Non-syntactic/semantic module re-organizatoin work

Comments

@jhaas-pfrc
Copy link
Collaborator

Many of the descriptions and references are missing terminating periods.

@jhaas-pfrc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This issue should be addressed after we've cleared the other issues that may churn the diff.

@suehares
Copy link
Collaborator

+1 on way to handle terminal periods and appropriate comma.

@jhaas-pfrc jhaas-pfrc added the cleanup Non-syntactic/semantic module re-organizatoin work label Jul 1, 2021
@jhaas-pfrc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mjethanandani recommends that we normalize our references in the format of "RFC XXXX: Complete sentence ending with a period."

@mjethanandani
Copy link
Owner

I was suggesting the format should be:

"RFC XXXX: Complete title of the RFC followed by a period."

@suehares
Copy link
Collaborator

Mahesh - I found your answer to my questions regarding RFC title here. Please consider the issue closed.

@keyur-arrcus
Copy link
Collaborator

@mahesh - ok with your suggestion. :)

@jhaas-pfrc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Partially addressed by Issue #263

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cleanup Non-syntactic/semantic module re-organizatoin work
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants