Public discussion and assistance can be found on discord @ #liqwid-plutarch-extra. Issues and project-management-related information are tracked on Notion.
A library containing builders for ScriptContext
s. Currently, we support
building ScriptContext
s with the Spending
and Minting
ScriptPurpose
s.
Building a ScriptContext
manually is sometimes necessary: testing is a good
example. However, doing this directly is tedious, error-prone and extremely
unclear in many places; this leads to significant wasted time and confusion.
plutarch-context-builder
aims to make this as easy as possible. We do this
through a combination of higher-level operations to describe what the script
should do, along with a Monoid
-based API to put things together. Users of
this library don't have to deal with the particulars of how
ScriptContext
s are defined if they don't want to, but they can still generate
them reliably and with minimal pain. More, the monoidal API allows overrides on
specific fields; for example, overriding Transaction ID. This allows users to
create a slightly different script context without laborious record
overriding or reconstructing contexts from scratch.
plutarch-context-builder
fits into the testing strategy of Liqwid Labs by
providing an ergonomic interface for "sample tests" in conjunction with
plutarch-unit
(a tasty
provider).
Sample tests are useful for
- Demonstrating the intended "happy path" of a script or transaction family
- Unit testing individual validators in isolation (i.e., not testing a full transaction). This can be useful, for instance, if multiple related validators are required to test a full transaction, but not all of them are fully implemented.
- Unit testing helper functions that work on a subset of the fields of a
ScriptContext
orTxInfo
, but that don't fit theDatum -> Redeemer -> ScriptContext -> ()
of a validator - Regression testing -- making specific, individual test cases when things break.
For other testing libraries that complement the functionality of plutarch-context-builder
,
see:
Everything is done monoidally in plutarch-context-builder
, from setting
UTXO
to adding values. Users can use <>
to combine interface
functions into larger script contexts.
There are two main types to consider: UTXO
and Builder a
. The former
constructs single UTXO in transactions:
data UTXO = UTXO
{ utxoCredential :: Maybe Credential
, utxoStakingCredential :: Maybe StakingCredential
, utxoValue :: Value
, utxoData :: Maybe DatumType
, utxoReferenceScript :: Maybe ScriptHash
, utxoTxId :: Maybe TxId
, utxoTxIdx :: Maybe Integer
}
There are a few things to note. First, a UTXO
can
be shared in different contexts as both input or output; TxOutRef
-related
fields get ignored when a UTXO
is being used as an output. Second, besides
Value
, the binary operator(<>
) will replace previous values. It allows users
to reuse pre-defined UTXO
s with updated information. Note that the binary operator
will always update the last given data.
let utxo = address "aabbcc" <> withStakingCredential (StakingPtr 1 2 3)
in utxo <> withStakingCredential (StakingPtr 7 8 9)
-- utxo is "updated" and now has 'StakingPtr 7 8 9'
Builder a
primarily appends instead of replacing. It will collect
multiple inputs, reference inputs, outputs, signatures, et cetra
and build the context out of it. User can expect it to combine similarly
to regular lists. Builder a
will only replace the TxId
and time range.
Builder a
is a typeclass, containing "common" script-building
interfaces. Using this, plutarch-context-builder
defines specific
builders such as SpendingBuilder
, MintingBuilder
, and TxInfoBuilder
.
These specific builders are specialized on handling the ScriptPurpose
when a full ScriptContext
is generated; they will require calling some
special interfaces --still Monoidal-- to build the ScriptContext
properly.
The example source can be found in the example
directory.
-- What can be shared between contexts
commonContext :: (Monoid a, Builder a) => a
commonContext =
mkOutRefIndices $ -- automatically assigns OutRefIdx
mconcat
[ input $
pubKey "aabb"
<> withValue (singleton "cc" "hello" 123)
<> withRefIndex 5
<> withStakingCredential (StakingPtr 0 0 0)
, input $
address (Address (PubKeyCredential $ PubKeyHash "aa") (Just $ StakingPtr 1 2 3))
<> withValue (singleton "cc" "hello" 123)
<> withDatum (123 :: Integer)
<> withRefTxId "eeff"
, output $
script "cccc"
<> withValue (singleton "dd" "world" 123)
, mint $ singleton "aaaa" "hello" 333
]
spendingContext :: SpendingBuilder
spendingContext = commonContext <> withSpendingOutRefIdx 5
spendingContext2 :: SpendingBuilder
spendingContext2 = commonContext <> withSpendingOutRefId "eeff"
mintingContext :: Mintingbuilder
mintingContext = generalSample <> withMinting "aaaa"
-- Build contexts
buildMinting mempty mintingContext
buildSpending mempty spendingContext
-- Builders that will return a product type instead of throwing error.
tryBuildMinting mempty mintingContext
tryBuildSpending mempty spendingContext
plutarch-context-builder
provides various checkers and some combinators
to construct custom ones. It comes with quasi-phase-1 validation that
will ensure all bytestrings are of the correct length, the inflow and outflow
of the context is equal, at least one signature is provided, et cetra.
Users can also construct a custom checker with a common contravariant interface:
data MyError = MoreThanOneInput
ensureOnlyOneInput :: Builder a => Checker MyError a
ensureOnlyOneInput =
checkAt AtInput $
mconcat $
[ contramap ((== 1) . length . bbInputs . unpack) (checkBool $ OtherError MoreThanOneInput)
, ... -- Multiple checkers can be combined as well.
, ...
]
-- Will return `Acc` list of errors
-- Empty list when no error is found
runChecker ensureOnlyOneInput context
-- User can run phase-1 validation with
buildSpending checkPhase1 context
If more sophisticated validation is required, plutus-simple-model
should be used. plutus-simple-model
uses functions directly from cardano-ledger
,
and thus is more true-to-life than plutarch-context-builder
.
plutarch-context-builder
aims to test simpler functionalities very
quickly and intuitively, while plutus-simple-model
almost simulates
an entire contract flow.
The plutarch-context-builder
code base follows strict standards to increase consistency, to minimize
the impact of legacy, to properly use automated tools, and more. The standards document
can be found here.