title | software | abstract | layout | series | publisher | issn | id | month | tex_title | firstpage | lastpage | page | order | cycles | bibtex_author | author | date | address | container-title | volume | genre | issued | extras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hidden yet quantifiable: A lower bound for confounding strength using randomized trials |
In the era of fast-paced precision medicine, observational studies play a major role in properly evaluating new treatments in clinical practice. Yet, unobserved confounding can significantly compromise causal conclusions drawn from non-randomized data. We propose a novel strategy that leverages randomized trials to quantify unobserved confounding. First, we design a statistical test to detect unobserved confounding above a certain strength. Then, we use the test to estimate an asymptotically valid lower bound on the unobserved confounding strength. We evaluate the power and validity of our statistical test on several synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets. Further, we show how our lower bound can correctly identify the absence and presence of unobserved confounding in a real-world example. |
inproceedings |
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
PMLR |
2640-3498 |
de-bartolomeis24a |
0 |
Hidden yet quantifiable: A lower bound for confounding strength using randomized trials |
1045 |
1053 |
1045-1053 |
1045 |
false |
De Bartolomeis, Piersilvio and Abad Martinez, Javier and Donhauser, Konstantin and Yang, Fanny |
|
2024-04-18 |
Proceedings of The 27th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics |
238 |
inproceedings |
|