abstract | section | title | layout | series | id | month | tex_title | firstpage | lastpage | page | order | cycles | bibtex_author | author | date | address | publisher | container-title | volume | genre | issued | extras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The analysis of Belief Propagation and other algorithms for the {\em reconstruction problem} plays a key role in the analysis of community detection in inference on graphs, phylogenetic reconstruction in bioinformatics, and the cavity method in statistical physics. We prove a conjecture of Evans, Kenyon, Peres, and Schulman (2000) which states that any bounded memory message passing algorithm is statistically much weaker than Belief Propagation for the reconstruction problem. More formally, any recursive algorithm with bounded memory for the reconstruction problem on the trees with the binary symmetric channel has a phase transition strictly below the Belief Propagation threshold, also known as the Kesten-Stigum bound. The proof combines in novel fashion tools from recursive reconstruction, information theory, and optimal transport, and also establishes an asymptotic normality result for BP and other message-passing algorithms near the critical threshold. |
contributed |
Accuracy-Memory Tradeoffs and Phase Transitions in Belief Propagation |
inproceedings |
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
jain19b |
0 |
Accuracy-Memory Tradeoffs and Phase Transitions in Belief Propagation |
1756 |
1771 |
1756-1771 |
1756 |
false |
Jain, Vishesh and Koehler, Frederic and Liu, Jingbo and Mossel, Elchanan |
|
2019-06-25 |
PMLR |
Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Conference on Learning Theory |
99 |
inproceedings |
|