Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look up zRIF's also in VitaSmith license.db database #23

Open
mmozeiko opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Look up zRIF's also in VitaSmith license.db database #23

mmozeiko opened this issue Oct 30, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@mmozeiko
Copy link
Owner

When items in pkgi.txt have no zRIF strings, try to lookup fake license in @VitaSmith license.db file.

@mmozeiko mmozeiko changed the title Use VitaSmith license.db file when pkgi.txt has no zRIF strings Look up zRIF's also in VitaSmith license.db database Oct 30, 2017
@MarioMasta64
Copy link

MarioMasta64 commented Oct 31, 2017

only issue with this is, is it directly linked? if it is expect backlash. if its inputted then its basically just another pkgi.txt .3. either way i dont see much point.

after all you closed another issue for the fact that the user should be creating these lists, and in-turn they should also be able to know their own zRif's if they created it but you do you :p

@mmozeiko
Copy link
Owner Author

mmozeiko commented Oct 31, 2017

What do you mean by "directly linked"? pkgi won't do anything about creating license.db or downloading it. It will be up to user to create and manage it. I believe there will be new feature in next VitaShell versions, which will allow to populate this database with license you have. That means pkgi could link one public list of pkg files without zRIF strings. It could be shared in public, and I'll link it or even use by default in github. licenses.db file allows clean separation for NoNpDrm fake license files and pkg unpacking.

@MarioMasta64
Copy link

so basically it would look for zrifs that are already in the system? :D that sounds neato

@mmozeiko
Copy link
Owner Author

mmozeiko commented Nov 1, 2017

Yes, potentially. Such feature for VitaShell was discussed somewhere. Using licenses.db will be just a nice extra feature. It won't be mandatory to use it if you don't want to.

@MarioMasta64
Copy link

in this way you wouldnt even need lists and could just download what you own from your system. tho id imagine that would piss off tons of people if that was the only way to do it after all theyd want to play their "backups" too lol

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants