You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, FloPy provides extensive support for many MODFLOW packages, but it seems the Surface-Water Routing (SWR) package from MODFLOW-NWT is not included. The SWR package is crucial for modeling surface-water and groundwater interactions, and having it integrated into FloPy would be highly beneficial for many users.
I would like to request the following:
Official Support for SWR: If feasible, adding SWR to FloPy would significantly enhance its capabilities.
Guidance for Custom Implementation: If official support is not planned, could you provide documentation or guidelines for extending FloPy to include unsupported packages like SWR?
Potential Benefits:
Expands FloPy’s functionality for coupled surface-water/groundwater modeling.
Allows for streamlined workflows when using MODFLOW-NWT with SWR.
Willing to Contribute:
I am happy to assist by testing or providing feedback if SWR support is developed.
Additional Context:
If there are known workarounds or plans for this in the future, any information would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, FloPy provides extensive support for many MODFLOW packages, but it seems the Surface-Water Routing (SWR) package from MODFLOW-NWT is not included. The SWR package is crucial for modeling surface-water and groundwater interactions, and having it integrated into FloPy would be highly beneficial for many users.
I would like to request the following:
Official Support for SWR: If feasible, adding SWR to FloPy would significantly enhance its capabilities.
Guidance for Custom Implementation: If official support is not planned, could you provide documentation or guidelines for extending FloPy to include unsupported packages like SWR?
Potential Benefits:
Expands FloPy’s functionality for coupled surface-water/groundwater modeling.
Allows for streamlined workflows when using MODFLOW-NWT with SWR.
Willing to Contribute:
I am happy to assist by testing or providing feedback if SWR support is developed.
Additional Context:
If there are known workarounds or plans for this in the future, any information would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: