--- title: '' bibliography: 'morinlab.bib' --- # @hubschmannMutationalMechanismsShaping2021 ## Study Overview In their 2021 study published in *Leukemia*, Hübschmann et al. conducted a comprehensive analysis of 181 germinal center-derived B-cell lymphomas (gcBCLs) using whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing. The research aimed to elucidate the mutational mechanisms influencing both coding and noncoding regions of the genome in these lymphomas. ## Key Findings ### Mutational Signatures - The study identified distinct mutational signatures associated with somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class-switch recombination (CSR). - Both SHM and CSR were found to contribute to off-target mutations in non-immunoglobulin (non-IG) genes, suggesting a broader impact on genomic integrity. ### Noncoding Regions - Mutations were prevalent in noncoding regions, including promoters and enhancers, indicating potential regulatory disruptions. - These noncoding mutations may influence gene expression and contribute to lymphomagenesis. ### Pathway Alterations - Recurrent mutations were observed in pathways related to B-cell development and function, such as the NF-κB and JAK-STAT signaling pathways. - These alterations underscore the role of specific signaling cascades in the pathogenesis of gcBCLs. ## Clinical Implications - The findings highlight the significance of both coding and noncoding mutations in the development of gcBCLs. - Understanding these mutational mechanisms may inform targeted therapeutic strategies and improve diagnostic precision. --- ## Conclusion Hübschmann et al.'s study provides valuable insights into the mutational processes shaping the genomes of germinal center-derived B-cell lymphomas. By revealing the contributions of SHM and CSR to off-target mutations and emphasizing the importance of noncoding regions, this research advances our understanding of lymphoma biology and potential avenues for treatment. ## Summary of novel genes |Entity| Tier 1 genes| Tier 2 genes|Tier 3 genes| |:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:| |FL|2|16|0| |DLBCL|4|20|3| ```mermaid --- config: sankey: showValues: true linkColor: target width: 600 height: 300 nodeAlignment: right prefix: '(' suffix: ' genes)' --- sankey-beta This study, New Tier 1, 4 New Tier 1, DLBCL Tier 1, 4 This study, New Tier 2, 20 New Tier 2, DLBCL Tier 2, 20 This study, New Tier 3, 3 New Tier 3, DLBCL Tier 3, 3 All other DLBCL studies, DLBCL Tier 1, 121 All other DLBCL studies, DLBCL Tier 2, 190 All other DLBCL studies, DLBCL Tier 3, 384 ``` ## Novel genes reported in this study ### Tier 1 |New gene|FL tier|DLBCL tier| Average variant quality | QC outcome | |:-|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:| |[ACTG1](../ACTG1)|2 |1 || | |[EEF1A1](../EEF1A1)|1 |1 || | |[HLA-DMB](../HLA-DMB)| |1 || | |[MEF2C](../MEF2C)|2 |1 || | |[VMA21](../VMA21)|1 | || | ### Tier 2 |New gene|FL tier|DLBCL tier| Average variant quality | QC outcome | |:-|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:| |[ADAMTS1](../ADAMTS1)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[ANKRD12](../ANKRD12)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[ATP6V1A](../ATP6V1A)|2 | || | |[CADPS2](../CADPS2)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |PASS | |[CDC42BPB](../CDC42BPB)|2 | || | |[CNOT2](../CNOT2)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |PASS | |[CPNE8](../CPNE8)|2 | || | |[DHX15](../DHX15)|2 | || | |[DHX16](../DHX16)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |PASS | |[DNM2](../DNM2)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[FZR1](../FZR1)|2 | || | |[IKBKE](../IKBKE)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |PASS | |[IRF1](../IRF1)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[JUP](../JUP)|2 | || | |[LAPTM5](../LAPTM5)|2 |2 |★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |PASS | |[LRP12](../LRP12)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[MGEA5](../MGEA5)|2 | || | |[MYCBP2](../MYCBP2)|2 | || | |[PDS5B](../PDS5B)|2 |2 |★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ |PASS | |[PNPO](../PNPO)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[PPP4C](../PPP4C)|2 | || | |[PRKDC](../PRKDC)|2 |2 || | |[RAC2](../RAC2)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[RBM6](../RBM6)|2 | || | |[SIAH2](../SIAH2)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[SLC34A2](../SLC34A2)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[TPP1](../TPP1)|2 | || | |[TRAF6](../TRAF6)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[UNC5B](../UNC5B)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[WNK1](../WNK1)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | |[ZNF217](../ZNF217)| |2 |★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆ |PASS | ### Tier 3 |New gene|FL tier|DLBCL tier| Average variant quality | QC outcome | |:-|:-:|:-:|:-:|:-:| |[GAK](../GAK)| |3 |★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |FAIL | |[HLA-DQA1](../HLA-DQA1)| |3 |★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |FAIL | |[NR2F2](../NR2F2)| |3 |★ ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ |FAIL | # Details