You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for developing this QP extension for transition cell type annotation.
I just have a basic question regarding QP when I read your paper.
In the identify score vector f_t, there are two constrains,
f_t between 0 and 1
sum of f_t <=1
I tend to interpret the f_t here as identify fraction (0% - 100%) of each cell identifies in the reference.
It is natural that the sum is equal to 1 or 100%.
But I get a bit confused by the < 1, meaning there are some cell identities missing in the reference ?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Capybara team,
Thanks for developing this QP extension for transition cell type annotation.
I just have a basic question regarding QP when I read your paper.
In the identify score vector f_t, there are two constrains,
I tend to interpret the f_t here as identify fraction (0% - 100%) of each cell identifies in the reference.
It is natural that the sum is equal to 1 or 100%.
But I get a bit confused by the < 1, meaning there are some cell identities missing in the reference ?
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: