You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're asking everyone to invest in the concepts of reproducibility and efficiency of reproducibility, both of which are enabled via dependency management systems such as remake, scipiper, drake, and targets.
Background
We hope that the case for reproducibility is clear - we work for a science agency, and science that can't be reproduced does little to advance knowledge or trust.
But, the investment in efficiency of reproducibility is harder to boil down into a zingy one-liner. Many of us have embraced this need because we have been bitten by issues in our real-world collaborations, and found that data science practices and a reproducibility culture offer great solutions. Karl Broman is an advocate for reproducibility in science and is faculty at UW Madison. He has given many talks on the subject and we're going to ask you to watch part of one of them so you can be exposed to some of Karl's science challenges and solutions. Karl will be talking about GNU make, which is the inspiration for almost every modern dependency tool that we can think of. Click on the image to kick off the video.
💻 Activity: Watch the above video on make and reproducible workflows up until the 11 minute mark (you are welcome to watch more)
Use a GitHub comment on this issue to let us know what you thought was interesting about these pipeline concepts using no more than 300 words.
I'll respond once I spot your comment (refresh if you don't hear from me right away).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're asking everyone to invest in the concepts of reproducibility and efficiency of reproducibility, both of which are enabled via dependency management systems such as
remake
,scipiper
,drake
, andtargets
.Background
We hope that the case for reproducibility is clear - we work for a science agency, and science that can't be reproduced does little to advance knowledge or trust.
But, the investment in efficiency of reproducibility is harder to boil down into a zingy one-liner. Many of us have embraced this need because we have been bitten by issues in our real-world collaborations, and found that data science practices and a reproducibility culture offer great solutions. Karl Broman is an advocate for reproducibility in science and is faculty at UW Madison. He has given many talks on the subject and we're going to ask you to watch part of one of them so you can be exposed to some of Karl's science challenges and solutions. Karl will be talking about GNU make, which is the inspiration for almost every modern dependency tool that we can think of. Click on the image to kick off the video.
💻 Activity: Watch the above video on make and reproducible workflows up until the 11 minute mark (you are welcome to watch more)
Use a GitHub comment on this issue to let us know what you thought was interesting about these pipeline concepts using no more than 300 words.
I'll respond once I spot your comment (refresh if you don't hear from me right away).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: