Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Skip tempo" by itself gives different waveform length than "Skip tempo" + "Round pitch" #14

Open
NintendoManiac64 opened this issue Apr 8, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@NintendoManiac64
Copy link

NintendoManiac64 commented Apr 8, 2023

This discrepancy I previously reported a couple of months ago back in the beta version(s) seems to still exist.

Simply put, having Skip tempo adjustment for quality checked but Round pitch for quality unchecked results in a waveform that has a different length compared to if you have Skip tempo adjustment for quality checked and also Round pitch for quality checked.

...well, at least with the AppImage on Linux Mint 20.3 Xfce.

Nevertheless, the point is, why is there a difference at all between these two configurations? I thought the benefit of Round pitch for quality was for when Skip tempo adjustment for quality was unchecked, but maybe my impression was wrong...?

@mysteryx93
Copy link
Owner

if there's no actual pitch-shifting being performed (skip tempo adjustment), the operation is lossless, and there's no point in "round pitch for quality"

@NintendoManiac64
Copy link
Author

NintendoManiac64 commented Apr 8, 2023

But there is an actual difference in the length of the waveform, so...

(to be clear, I'm not talking about added and/or padded silence at the beginning or end but rather the parts with actual audio).

@mysteryx93
Copy link
Owner

if it rounds, it alters the pitch slightly differently along with the length, and the length doesn't get corrected

That seems normal

although when performing lossless stretching, the option for rounding could be disabled

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants