You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This discrepancy I previously reported a couple of months ago back in the beta version(s) seems to still exist.
Simply put, having Skip tempo adjustment for quality checked but Round pitch for quality unchecked results in a waveform that has a different length compared to if you have Skip tempo adjustment for quality checked and also Round pitch for quality checked.
...well, at least with the AppImage on Linux Mint 20.3 Xfce.
Nevertheless, the point is, why is there a difference at all between these two configurations? I thought the benefit of Round pitch for quality was for when Skip tempo adjustment for quality was unchecked, but maybe my impression was wrong...?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if there's no actual pitch-shifting being performed (skip tempo adjustment), the operation is lossless, and there's no point in "round pitch for quality"
This discrepancy I previously reported a couple of months ago back in the beta version(s) seems to still exist.
Simply put, having
Skip tempo adjustment for quality
checked butRound pitch for quality
unchecked results in a waveform that has a different length compared to if you haveSkip tempo adjustment for quality
checked and alsoRound pitch for quality
checked....well, at least with the AppImage on Linux Mint 20.3 Xfce.
Nevertheless, the point is, why is there a difference at all between these two configurations? I thought the benefit of
Round pitch for quality
was for whenSkip tempo adjustment for quality
was unchecked, but maybe my impression was wrong...?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: