Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need a way to define passes that do not auto-generate transformers. #7

Open
akeep opened this issue Dec 26, 2016 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@akeep
Copy link
Member

akeep commented Dec 26, 2016

In the current version of the nanopass framework, passes with always auto-generate missing transformers and assume that that is what was intended by the programmer, even if the programmer simply missed a case, or misspecified a cata-morphism.

It should be possible to disable this when the programmer wishes to see instead receive an error for a missing transformer.

(requested, most recently, by Tim Zakian--but also by Kent Dybvig, Eric Holk, etc.)

@akeep akeep self-assigned this Dec 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant