You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Binary crates are meant to be development tools (such as diesel_cli) so including tac in package managers would make them more easily accessible and more correct.
Sure, it's definitely not a bad idea. We already have one package on Chocolatey; but the procedure in getting packages listed and approved is just a downright pain compared to the ease with which one may publish packages on crates.io
I've never submitted a package to homebrew; I'm not sure how involved that would be. It builds from source in the first place, doesn't it? Any suggestions on going about that?
I have no interest in tracking down the zillion different processes of getting a package listed for the hundreds of popular Linux distros, but it would of course be awesome to have tac listed on there.
Binary crates are meant to be development tools (such as
diesel_cli
) so includingtac
in package managers would make them more easily accessible and more correct.Is this something you would be interested in providing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: