Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encountered error with sysbox installation for Ubuntu2204 AMI (ami-00437f3eed7a355f7) #842

Open
bobby-lin-cdc opened this issue Oct 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working question Further information is requested

Comments

@bobby-lin-cdc
Copy link

Hi Sysbox, I encountered the following error and it seems like a module is missing.

Is it related to the AMI?

Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 systemd[1]: Starting Sysbox installer helper service...
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36391]: Reading package lists...
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36391]: Building dependency tree...
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36391]: Reading state information...
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36391]: ca-certificates is already the newest version (20240203~22.04.1).
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36391]: 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 57 not upgraded.
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36394]: Hit:1 http://ap-southeast-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy InRelease
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36394]: Hit:2 http://ap-southeast-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates InRelease
Oct 07 05:10:48 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36394]: Hit:3 http://ap-southeast-1.ec2.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-backports InRelease
Oct 07 05:10:49 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36394]: Hit:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security InRelease
Oct 07 05:10:49 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36394]: Hit:5 http://ppa.launchpad.net/cloud-images/eks-01.11.0/ubuntu jammy InRelease
Oct 07 05:10:50 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36394]: Reading package lists...
Oct 07 05:10:50 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: Reading package lists...
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: Building dependency tree...
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: Reading state information...
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: fuse is already the newest version (2.9.9-5ubuntu3).
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: iptables is already the newest version (1.8.7-1ubuntu5.2).
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: rsync is already the newest version (3.2.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.2).
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36779]: 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 57 not upgraded.
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36386]: Skipping shiftfs installation (kernel has id-mapped mounts support).
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36386]: Probing kernel modules ...
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 sh[36792]: modprobe: FATAL: Module configfs not found in directory /lib/modules/6.5.0-1023-aws
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 systemd[1]: sysbox-installer-helper.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 systemd[1]: sysbox-installer-helper.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'.
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 systemd[1]: Failed to start Sysbox installer helper service.
Oct 07 05:10:51 ip-192-168-62-189 systemd[1]: sysbox-installer-helper.service: Consumed 3.033s CPU time.
@ctalledo
Copy link
Member

Hi @bobby-lin-cdc,

Is it related to the AMI?

Yes, seems like Sysbox is looking for the kernel's configfs module but it's not present in the AMI's kernel image.

I have to double-check if Sysbox really needs that module though. At one point it did, but I think it may no longer need it. If that's the case, then we will remove the dependency.

@ctalledo ctalledo self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
@ctalledo ctalledo added the question Further information is requested label Oct 10, 2024
@rodnymolina
Copy link
Member

@bobby-lin-cdc, we have a fix for this one here. Our next release (in a few days) will incorporate it.

@rodnymolina rodnymolina self-assigned this Oct 11, 2024
@rodnymolina rodnymolina added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 11, 2024
@bobby-lin-cdc
Copy link
Author

Thank you so much for your help!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants