You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A potential idea is to match stubs to existing records earlier in the process. That is, if a record exists, associate it with the study.
This has two advantages:
Users know how many studies they already have access to their coordinates
More meta-data can be added automatically.
Perhaps it's enough to simply let users know there's a match, for informational purposes, without necessarily exposing much else until the Extraction phase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
adelavega
changed the title
Eagerly match stubs to existing records?
Show percentage of studies that have a record in NeuroStore early in Project?
Jun 13, 2023
A potential idea is to match stubs to existing records earlier in the process. That is, if a record exists, associate it with the study.
This has two advantages:
Perhaps it's enough to simply let users know there's a match, for informational purposes, without necessarily exposing much else until the Extraction phase.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: