-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
guideline for handling interpolation and extrapolation in TL #54
Comments
I guess online does not use "extrapolation" from the end point of traj. But offline use "extrapolation". |
it relates #60 |
Finally I find even either online, offline, we will not use extrapolation. |
We discussed
I think that is related in this issue. It depend on how we define dense time robustness. |
Still we need to discuss which is better to return either [] or inf/-inf when there are no data points. |
We will keep use only interpolation because it leads misunderstanding for "application user". |
It relates #112 |
When time = [0, inf], then we have time bounded trajectory traj_time = [s-time, e-time], how we handle the start bound = [0, s-time) and the end bound = [e-time, inf]?
I think now we just ignore the start bound = [0, s-time)
For the end bound = [e-time, inf], we expect the extrapolation of the end of trajectory, then calculate [e-time, end of bound of timed operator].
That makes sense, other wise, the robustness trajectory becomes shorten and shorten in every nest of formula.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: