-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Diff in Diffs #14
Comments
It may be worth comparing SCM w/ the new generation of Diff-in-Diffs estimators. The author has a disclaimer that he's not comparing the performance of alternative estimation strategies ... |
That would be interesting. The disclaimer in myblog post is because I don't actually think that the factor structure in the DGP satisfies the Callaway & Sant'Anna assumptions. Baker et al (2021) has a different simulation where C&SA works better: https://andrewcbaker.netlify.app/ Here's a stripped down version of that simulation that I coded up |
Reminder for self: here is a link to @andrewchbaker's DiD codes for "How Much Should We Trust Staggered Difference-in-Differences Estimates?" |
Also @borusyak's https://github.com/borusyak/did_imputation
Also: |
@kylebutts has did2s (R/STATA)
|
|
I coded the classic Diff in Diffs (two way Fixed Effect) outcome model, which is a special case of Synthetic Controls.
I just discovered @junyuan-chen's new package DiffinDiffs.jl which has a few of the latest DiD techniques.
Maybe, if there is interest, at some point there can be an opportunity to join forces?
Maybe create an umbrella organization? (ProgramEvaluation.jl?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: