You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue to note assumptions around oil/solid fuel/biomass fuels in the mapping from energy demand output to energy supply inputs.
The supply model doesn't have any method to supply the requirements for biomass, oil or solid fuel, so assumes that each fuel is being used for heating within energy hubs. Gas is the majority fuel for heating, so these are added to the gas load.
However, there are contradictory assumptions: given the assumption that these demands are for heat, they could be assigned to heatload directly instead of gas; and given that the demand model outputs heat demand separately, these are explicitly non-heat demands for those fuels.
My expectation would be not to pass these to energy supply at all. It would be better to just include these in the results as the raw energy demand outputs rather than try to fudge them into the energy supply model where they will just skew the gas demand figures.
Issue to note assumptions around oil/solid fuel/biomass fuels in the mapping from energy demand output to energy supply inputs.
The supply model doesn't have any method to supply the requirements for biomass, oil or solid fuel, so assumes that each fuel is being used for heating within energy hubs. Gas is the majority fuel for heating, so these are added to the gas load.
However, there are contradictory assumptions: given the assumption that these demands are for heat, they could be assigned to heatload directly instead of gas; and given that the demand model outputs heat demand separately, these are explicitly non-heat demands for those fuels.
Constrained mode:
Unconstrained/optimised mode:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: