Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

driver and drivers fields should be considered ephemeral? #178

Closed
mightyiam opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #182
Closed

driver and drivers fields should be considered ephemeral? #178

mightyiam opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #182

Comments

@mightyiam
Copy link

        "driver": "usbhid",
        "driver_module": "usbhid",
        "drivers": [
          "usbhid"
        ],
        "driver_modules": [
          "usbhid"
        ],
        "driver": "igc",
        "driver_module": "igc",
        "drivers": [
          "igc"
        ],
        "driver_modules": [
          "igc"
        ],
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Feb 10, 2025

We need drivers for many useful features. Without the drivers field we cannot add the needed block device or graphics drivers to the initrd and we cannot boot NixOS.
In theory this could change over time if the Linux kernel changes its implementation, but this will be also true for any other hardware information that we obtain.
I have not seen significant diverging in factor report output over time.

@Mic92 Mic92 closed this as completed Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants