-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enable running age structured production models directly with SS3? #258
Comments
It would also be discussing with the ss3diags maintainers if building it within ss3 makes more sense. |
This is very similar to the existing SS3 option to do DB-SRA in a dedicated first phase which works like this: For ASPM |
Hi Rick, if you start from an existing configuration, the rec_devs and init_rev_devs are set to zero? (they will need to be for ASPM, which will not estimate rec_devs, and ASPM-R, which will estimate rec_devs, but not for ASPM-fix, which will use the rec_devs from the full model as fixed values)
F_init and R_init also need to be estimated because they interfere in the overall scale too.
|
Thanks Carolina. Yes, recdevs would need to be set to zero. |
closed because seems like it would be better as a wrapper rather than in SS3 |
FYI- The SS-DL tool does allow for easy ASPM set-up. |
Thanks @shcaba! That is good to know, and seems like the right spot for it. |
I think we can close this out by adding brief description in the SS3 manual about this SS-DL option. |
Moved to nmfs-ost/ss3-doc#100 |
There was much discussion of the ASPM diagnostic during the CAPAM workshop: http://www.capamresearch.org/Diagnostics-Workshop inspired by a presentation from @cminte (PDF).
The status-quo approach to ASPM involves modifying the SS3 input files and re-running the model as described on this slide from @cminte below and in this R script: https://github.com/PIFSCstockassessments/ss3diags/blob/master/Cookbook/Setup_ASPM_example.R#L11-L42 (there may be more automated R scripts out there that I'm not aware of).
However, @Rick-Methot-NOAA noted in discussion today that it would be possible to build this functionality directly into SS3 so that users could request the ASPM to be run automatically in addition to the full model.
Given the reliance on estimated selectivity parameters sometimes recdevs in ASPMdev (or ASPM-R) from the full model, this estimation step would have to take place in a phase after the main estimation phases and the main output file had been written. An alternative (or in addition) to automatically running an ASPM would be to write a control_ASPM.ss output file that fixed the appropriate parameters at the MLE estimates and leave it to the user to run it through SS3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: