Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated tests in CI? #168

Open
teolupus opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Automated tests in CI? #168

teolupus opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@teolupus
Copy link

Is the Cisco APIC ML2 Driver still being tested by Jenkins upstream, so we can ensure all tests are passing against a specific release of OpenStack?

@tbachman
Copy link
Contributor

When you say "still being tested by Jenkins upstream", what are you referring to? The repo currently undergoes Travis CI whenever changes are pushed, and undergoes system testing whenever new releases are created (about every couple of months).

@teolupus
Copy link
Author

teolupus commented Jul 8, 2019

Hi Thomas. The README.md file at https://opendev.org/x/networking-cisco/src/branch/master/networking_cisco/ml2_drivers/apic lead me to believe this repository hosted Cisco's APIC plugin for the Neutron ML2 driver. As a result, I was expecting it to be tested on every (relevant) code change to OpenStack Neutron. Could you point me to where the APIC plugin code is maintained and tested? Is it on https://opendev.org/x/group-based-policy?

@tbachman
Copy link
Contributor

tbachman commented Jul 8, 2019

The newton release is the last release we supported this driver. The plugin that we support is listed in that link (i.e. noironetworks repo). The newton release is tested in the gate, and there are parts of this driver that are included in that testing, as some of the code is used by the legacy APIC mapping driver (GBP workflow/APIs). However, the apic-ml2-driver is not tested by itself in the upstream gate - it has UTs run in Travis CI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants