You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 12, 2018. It is now read-only.
When two LC call numbers appear in a record, both are placed in the shelfMarkLcc property, but only the first one is in the associated bf:label. It seems that both call numbers should be in the label. It does not appear to depend on indicator values.
When two LC call numbers appear in a record, both are placed in the shelfMarkLcc property, but only the first one is in the associated bf:label. It seems that both call numbers should be in the label. It does not appear to depend on indicator values.
First example:
050 _4 |a HN700.55.A8 |b B355 2011
050 00 |a HQ799.T5 |b B36 2011
(OCLC # 757718798)
Second example:
050 00 |a PM7802 |b .A86 2013
050 14 |a G1046.E365 |b A84 2013
(OCLC # 839396764)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: