-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add 2016 election precinct shapes for Oregon #51
Comments
When researching & requesting data also ask for matching election results (presidential, congressional, state house, and state senate) in addition to the precinct shape data for 2016, and for earlier election years if available. |
Many counties, but many files and not clear if there are precincts: |
|
Shapes:
Results:
|
Matt Hampton at Metro probably knows who knows. You have his contact? |
I've asked one of the authors of this interactive map for data (2014) via Twitter: |
I've asked Matt via email. |
Sounds like we can get (most populated counties) of the 2014 data from the Oregon Live source :) Everyone is pointing to the Metro precinct shapes as the best source, there may also be a similar southern Oregon consortium called GeoMoose of all things. Something like? |
@nvkelso said this earlier:
I've been working to get election results from counties, but not shapefiles. I would say that requesting this data is unnecessary at this point. I have requests in for all counties with missing (n/a) results. See the issues of the various counties where I've been tracking most communication with the various county clerks. Current status of the Oregon OE election results is as follows:
|
@nk9 Awesome, thanks for the update, great work! We'll stay focused on the shapefiles in this |
The Portland Metro has metadata, including the following lineage:
|
partial towards #51 to add 3 counties around Portland (metro)
I've added 2016 precinct shapes via #86, but we should go back thru and ask Metro for the earlier files so we have a complete set (metadata says the shapes changed quite a bit version to version). |
Does the work to get the shape files from Multnomah/Portland mean that you've hit a dead end with getting them in bulk from the Oregon SoS? |
Someone needs to call / email SOS, yes.
… On Mar 14, 2017, at 05:58, Nick Kocharhook ***@***.***> wrote:
Does the focus on getting the shape files from Multnomah/Portland mean that you've hit a dead end with getting them in bulk from the Oregon SoS?
―
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
OK, I'm already in touch with Nick Kramer at OR SoS for the outstanding results, so I'll ask about the shapefiles as well. |
Thanks!
… On Mar 14, 2017, at 10:09, Nick Kocharhook ***@***.***> wrote:
OK, I'm already in touch with Nick Kramer at OR SoS for the outstanding results, so I'll ask about the shapefiles as well.
―
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
partial towards #51 to add 3 counties around Portland (metro)
From Kevin Rancik - email - (required credit CC-BY):
Found via attribution note on https://decisiondeskhq.com/data-dives/creating-a-national-precinct-map/. |
The missing 2016 county precinct shapes are: County name, FIPS code, population
|
@nk9 Some good Oregon precinct data found above :) |
The 2016 GeoDB mentioned in #51 (comment) isn't openable on my Mac using QGIS or on a desktop Windows machine in ArcExplorer or ArcGIS. |
I've followed up with Nick Kramer, since it's been several weeks since I asked about the shape files. Will let you know when I hear back from him. |
Do you have access to newer ArcGIS to see if you can convert the 2016 GeoDB to SHP?
… On Apr 3, 2017, at 05:05, Nick Kocharhook ***@***.***> wrote:
I've followed up with Nick Kramer, since it's been several weeks since I asked about the shape files. Will let you know when I hear back from him.
―
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
I am no GIS expert, but I converted them to shapefiles, also: |
Now it's just the 1/2 dozen missing counties of precincts in Montana and the'll be "shapes for everyone" :) |
Verified new GDAL/OGR 2.1 and QGIS 2.18 on Mac will open the GeoDB fine! |
A few more counties in Oregon will need research: #110. |
Priority 3 based on population
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: