You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, I now think to know the problem of #66 (comment). @LuixLore You have the same heatpipetype, because this heatpipe type is the linearization of multiple DN numbers. In your postprocessing, you should map back the results of the capacity, to your assumptions of which DN number can transport which capacity.
We should/could add an exmaple for that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree, an example how to recalculate the DN number for each pipe leading to the required output for a following simulation would be a great extension to the existing examples.
Maybe it is possible to offer a general approach with some common values of existing grids which pipes diameter are used for a certain capacity and temperature level / delta temperature.
Maybe it is possible to offer a general approach with some common values of existing grids which pipes diameter are used for a certain capacity and temperature level / delta temperature.
This is exactly what the pre-calculation example is doing ... calculating the transport capacity dependent on a given specific pressure drop and assumed temperatures.
So, I now think to know the problem of #66 (comment). @LuixLore You have the same heatpipetype, because this heatpipe type is the linearization of multiple DN numbers. In your postprocessing, you should map back the results of the capacity, to your assumptions of which DN number can transport which capacity.
We should/could add an exmaple for that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: