-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork eza instead #1243
Comments
Second occurrence of |
Thank you so much for keeping us updated on the situation. I'm sure we all appreciate your effort to keep this project going! <3 |
Thanks, fixed the typo x) |
exa is unmaintained. Ref: ogham/exa#1243
exa is unmaintained, eza is a maintained fork. See ogham/exa#1243. Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson <[email protected]>
You can archive this repository, to mark it as unmaintained. People then cannot submit PRs and there is a big warning that this is archived. IMHO this would make it more obvious this is not maintained anymore. Edit: Oh sorry just read your OP, forget it, you said that there already. Anyway, thanks for maintaining it so long! 🤗 |
exa is unmaintained. See ogham/exa#1243
|
`exa` is unmaintained: ogham/exa#1243 Switch to the recommended community fork (which seems to have critical mass activity).
Just found this issue when today, Thursday, July 25, 2024, for the first time brew let me know that @ariasuni , thanks for all your work keeping exa going, and for taking the time to help people find |
Use eza-community/eza instead. ogham/exa#1243
According to [this][issue], `exa` is now unmaintained. It recommends to use the actively maintained [`eza`][eza] fork instead. [issue]: ogham/exa#1243 [eza]: https://github.com/eza-community/eza
eza is an active fork of exa, which is now unmaintained. See ogham/exa#1243
eza is an active fork of exa, which is now unmaintained. See ogham/exa#1243
What happend to him @ogham? |
No idea, I didn’t hear from him since 2021-04-03, but his website is still up. Last activity from his part I can find online is a retweet on twitter dot com of a post from 2022-07-06. |
The last activity I was able to find were 12th June 2023 and 9th June 2023 https://git.sr.ht/~ogham/bugbear-go/commit/e9375fd8bdba2627ec400b2ec6869186a5bca1ad Website's certificate was issued Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 1:54:55 PM although probably been done automatically by certbot. |
Id just like to say, as someone who just found this tool, I think its quite strange that a project owner and leader would just completely ghost a community with 155 other contributors and 24k Github stars, without even so much as sending a response telling people that they don't feel like leading the project anymore. I mean there's nothing wrong with wanting to quit the project, but its another thing entirely to just ghost the rest of the team and not even respond their messages. |
I'm not sure but I'm afraid you are failing to consider that the maintainer may be deceased. I don't see any activity on their GitHub or Twitter and their website is gone. |
I’ve long felt it could be a possibility. I just sent him an e-mail (his mail server, on the same domain as his website, still seem to be working), and I also contacted the company listed on his profile. I’ll keep you posted if I get any news. For the record, I met him at a RustFest, I think the Zürich one in 2017, but maybe the Paris one in 2018, even thought we barely spoke. I felt proud that he valued my contributions enough, to later gave me the right to commit and merge on his “first real open-source project” (his words), and trusted me to respect his vision for his project. |
they gave a gift to the world, and in a form that could be kept maintained by someone else (see eza)... whatever the reason for them going abruptly absent, I feel they should be given more grace than this accusation |
I remember wondering about this and I think I found that after some time he stopped committing to GitHub he made a blog post or something like that which suggested travel. I reckon he's got fed up with tech and become spiritual somewhere and has probably become a monk. I've been thinking of doing something like that myself. |
hmmmm....... |
Most things I can find online seem to suggest he is not dead. I was literally just pointing out that it's strange to disappear without even sending a message (assuming he has not passed away), and you seem to think that's somehow slandering him directly. I'm sorry if I came across that way. I can find other people online saying something very similar to what I just said:
|
exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork eza instead.
A lot of work has already been put into it by other people, and I’ll be porting my ongoing work to this fork. Sadly, @ogham seems unreachable so I can’t really archive the project… for now, I’ll redirect people to eza, from the README and issues page.
A page is turning for me: it was great maintaining exa on my own for a while but it wasn’t sustainable and I was in burnout, I’m so glad people finally created a fork that I could contribute to instead of having to handle the whole thing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: