Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork eza instead #1243

Open
ariasuni opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 29 comments
Open

exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork eza instead #1243

ariasuni opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 29 comments

Comments

@ariasuni
Copy link
Collaborator

ariasuni commented Sep 5, 2023

exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork eza instead.

A lot of work has already been put into it by other people, and I’ll be porting my ongoing work to this fork. Sadly, @ogham seems unreachable so I can’t really archive the project… for now, I’ll redirect people to eza, from the README and issues page.

A page is turning for me: it was great maintaining exa on my own for a while but it wasn’t sustainable and I was in burnout, I’m so glad people finally created a fork that I could contribute to instead of having to handle the whole thing.

@Aehmlo
Copy link

Aehmlo commented Sep 5, 2023

Second occurrence of exa in the current title should probably read eza?

@kohane27
Copy link

kohane27 commented Sep 6, 2023

Thank you so much for keeping us updated on the situation. I'm sure we all appreciate your effort to keep this project going! <3

@ariasuni ariasuni changed the title exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork exa instead exa is unmaintained, please use the active fork eza instead Sep 6, 2023
@ariasuni
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ariasuni commented Sep 6, 2023

Second occurrence of exa in the current title should probably read eza?

Thanks, fixed the typo x)

@rugk
Copy link

rugk commented Sep 6, 2023

You can archive this repository, to mark it as unmaintained. People then cannot submit PRs and there is a big warning that this is archived.

IMHO this would make it more obvious this is not maintained anymore.

Edit: Oh sorry just read your OP, forget it, you said that there already.

Anyway, thanks for maintaining it so long! 🤗

sheck added a commit to sheck/.dotfiles that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2024
Aetf added a commit to Aetf/dotfiles that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2024
exa is unmaintained. See ogham/exa#1243
thara added a commit to thara/dotfiles that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2024
@zx1986
Copy link

zx1986 commented Jul 11, 2024

brew install eza works

zx1986 added a commit to zx1986/xBrew that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2024
ccpost added a commit to ccpost/dotfiles that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2024
`exa` is unmaintained: ogham/exa#1243
Switch to the recommended community fork (which seems to have critical
mass activity).
@johntdavis84
Copy link

Just found this issue when today, Thursday, July 25, 2024, for the first time brew let me know that exa was unmaintained.

@ariasuni , thanks for all your work keeping exa going, and for taking the time to help people find eza. I really appreciate all your hard work and hope you're doing well with your current endeavors.

idadzie added a commit to idadzie/dotfiles that referenced this issue Aug 3, 2024
Use eza-community/eza instead. ogham/exa#1243
HarrisonMc555 added a commit to HarrisonMc555/dotfiles that referenced this issue Oct 1, 2024
According to [this][issue], `exa` is now unmaintained. It recommends
to use the actively maintained [`eza`][eza] fork instead.

[issue]: ogham/exa#1243
[eza]: https://github.com/eza-community/eza
slowmoyang added a commit to slowmoyang/dotfiles that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2024
maxim-uvarov pushed a commit to maxim-uvarov/nu_scripts_reduced_size that referenced this issue Oct 12, 2024
eza is an active fork of exa, which is now unmaintained.
See ogham/exa#1243
maxim-uvarov pushed a commit to maxim-uvarov/nu_scripts_reduced_size that referenced this issue Oct 13, 2024
eza is an active fork of exa, which is now unmaintained.
See ogham/exa#1243
@54853315
Copy link

What happend to him @ogham?

@ariasuni
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ariasuni commented Nov 1, 2024

No idea, I didn’t hear from him since 2021-04-03, but his website is still up. Last activity from his part I can find online is a retweet on twitter dot com of a post from 2022-07-06.

@nikelborm
Copy link

nikelborm commented Nov 2, 2024

The last activity I was able to find were 12th June 2023 and 9th June 2023

https://git.sr.ht/~ogham/bugbear-go/commit/e9375fd8bdba2627ec400b2ec6869186a5bca1ad
https://git.sr.ht/~ogham/doom/commit/429ecca9db91a07752b95e2363c3af10a92ad394

Website's certificate was issued Wednesday, August 14, 2024 at 1:54:55 PM although probably been done automatically by certbot.

@edward-jazzhands
Copy link

Id just like to say, as someone who just found this tool, I think its quite strange that a project owner and leader would just completely ghost a community with 155 other contributors and 24k Github stars, without even so much as sending a response telling people that they don't feel like leading the project anymore. I mean there's nothing wrong with wanting to quit the project, but its another thing entirely to just ghost the rest of the team and not even respond their messages.

@verheyenkoen
Copy link

Id just like to say, as someone who just found this tool, I think its quite strange that a project owner and leader would just completely ghost a community with 155 other contributors and 24k Github stars, without even so much as sending a response telling people that they don't feel like leading the project anymore. I mean there's nothing wrong with wanting to quit the project, but its another thing entirely to just ghost the rest of the team and not even respond their messages.

I'm not sure but I'm afraid you are failing to consider that the maintainer may be deceased. I don't see any activity on their GitHub or Twitter and their website is gone.

@ariasuni
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm not sure but I'm afraid you are failing to consider that the maintainer may be deceased. I don't see any activity on their GitHub or Twitter and their website is gone.

I’ve long felt it could be a possibility. I just sent him an e-mail (his mail server, on the same domain as his website, still seem to be working), and I also contacted the company listed on his profile. I’ll keep you posted if I get any news.

For the record, I met him at a RustFest, I think the Zürich one in 2017, but maybe the Paris one in 2018, even thought we barely spoke. I felt proud that he valued my contributions enough, to later gave me the right to commit and merge on his “first real open-source project” (his words), and trusted me to respect his vision for his project.

@tshepang
Copy link

Id just like to say, as someone who just found this tool, I think its quite strange that a project owner and leader would just completely ghost a community with 155 other contributors and 24k Github stars, without even so much as sending a response telling people that they don't feel like leading the project anymore. I mean there's nothing wrong with wanting to quit the project, but its another thing entirely to just ghost the rest of the team and not even respond their messages.

they gave a gift to the world, and in a form that could be kept maintained by someone else (see eza)... whatever the reason for them going abruptly absent, I feel they should be given more grace than this accusation

@eggbean
Copy link

eggbean commented Feb 17, 2025

I remember wondering about this and I think I found that after some time he stopped committing to GitHub he made a blog post or something like that which suggested travel. I reckon he's got fed up with tech and become spiritual somewhere and has probably become a monk. I've been thinking of doing something like that myself.

@nikelborm
Copy link

hmmmm.......
https://github.com/exa-labs

@edward-jazzhands
Copy link

edward-jazzhands commented Feb 19, 2025

Most things I can find online seem to suggest he is not dead. I was literally just pointing out that it's strange to disappear without even sending a message (assuming he has not passed away), and you seem to think that's somehow slandering him directly. I'm sorry if I came across that way. I can find other people online saying something very similar to what I just said:

There’s a ray of hope on their RSS feed: https://bsago.me/tech-notes/feed.json

The last published date is September 2022, which is almost a year after their last GitHub activity: https://github.com/ogham?tab=overview&from=2021-12-01&to=202...

So in absence of other information, I’d rather believe they’re ok. I’ve gone through periods of my life where I blow off all existing responsibilities and reinvent myself. A big project like exa comes with a lot of responsibilities that don’t become apparent until it explodes in popularity; it’s understandable for people to want to disassociate from those.

Some might argue that open source authors have a responsibility to communicate status, but it seems like Benjamin fulfilled that by making sure exa had additional maintainers that could update the readme with a deprecation notice.

One other strange phenomenon is that when you run from a responsibility, it can feel like more and more of a hurdle to come back and face it, at least for me. So it’s probably best to assume they’re fine and to put as little pressure on them as possible. Even just popping in to say “I’m still alive” can feel like pressure.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37416814

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests