Proposal: Abandon the use of develop branch #79
Closed
oliverbooth
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
If anybody has any comments on this, they would be appreciated! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Branch removed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Over the years, I've noticed the use of
developbranch being phased out in various repositories. In dotnet/roslyn, the only branches aremain, and various release or feature branches. The idea is that sincemainhosts the latest buildable code,developreally serves no purpose except to introduce merge conflicts when collaborating with others 😅It may be time to do the same for X10D, and put
developout to pasture. This would not affect hotfix/ or feature/ branches, these conventions are still common and even I - myself - am using such feature/ branches for various purposes locally. But since even the CI workflow for a nightly push is now triggered bymain, notdevelop, the branch seems to serve no purpose anymore.See also: https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/312022/the-trend-of-the-develop-branch-going-away
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions